FTNT: Class Action Alert! Are You Missing Out?

Company Overview & Recent Developments

Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTNT) is a global cybersecurity company known for its FortiGate firewalls and security software. In August 2025, Fortinet’s stock price plunged about 22% in a single day after management issued a weaker Q3 revenue forecast and revealed that a much-hyped firewall hardware refresh cycle was already largely complete (^[1]). This surprise slowdown in growth spurred multiple law firms to announce shareholder class action lawsuits alleging that Fortinet misled investors about its business prospects (^[2]) (^[2]). Below, we dive into Fortinet’s dividend policy, financial leverage, valuation, and the key risks and questions facing the company in light of these events.

Dividend Policy & Shareholder Returns

No Regular Dividend: Fortinet does not pay a dividend, and has no history of regular dividend payouts (^[3]). The trailing twelve-month dividend per share is $0.00, yielding 0.0%, reflecting management’s focus on growth over cash dividends (^[3]). This policy is common among high-growth tech companies that prefer to reinvest profits or return capital via share buybacks rather than dividends.

Share Buybacks: Instead of dividends, Fortinet returns cash to shareholders through stock repurchases. In the second quarter of 2025 alone, the company repurchased and retired about $401 million of its own shares (^[4]). Fortinet’s board has authorized buyback programs in recent years, and the company views buybacks as a flexible way to deploy excess cash. Notably, Fortinet holds more cash than debt on its balance sheet (discussed below), providing capacity for continued buybacks (^[5]) (^[5]). Management cautions that these repurchases can exacerbate stock price volatility, as noted in the risk disclosures (^[5]), but they remain an important tool for boosting shareholder value.

The #1 Crypto to “Buy the Dip” With Right Now!

Before prices SHOOT up… Again. Get the guide that picks the altcoin smart money is whispering about.

Handled billions in lending—this altcoin powers real loans
Dropped to bargain-basement prices despite growth
90-day money-back guarantee (yep, really)

Get the $3 Guide

See Why It Could Explode →

Limited Time: Save 97%

AFFO/FFO: Metrics like Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) or Funds From Operations (FFO) are not applicable to Fortinet, since those are used for REITs and other asset-heavy businesses. Instead, investors often look at free cash flow. Fortinet generated $284.1 million of free cash flow in Q2 2025, which was down from $318.9 million in the prior-year quarter (^[4]). This decline was partly due to working capital swings and higher capital expenditures, and it was noted by analysts as a point of concern. Overall, Fortinet’s capital return strategy relies on growth and buybacks, not dividend income – a profile suited to investors looking for capital appreciation over yield.

Leverage, Debt Maturities & Coverage

Debt Profile: Fortinet carries a modest amount of long-term debt. In March 2021, the company issued $1.0 billion of senior unsecured notes, split into two equal tranches: $500 million of 1.0% coupon notes due March 2026, and $500 million of 2.2% notes due March 2031 (^[5]). These fixed-rate senior notes are the bulk of Fortinet’s debt. As of June 30, 2025, the 2026 notes have less than a year to maturity (reclassified to current liabilities), while the 2031 notes remain long-term (^[5]) (^[5]). Importantly, Fortinet has no significant financial covenants attached to this debt and can consider early redemption subject to make-whole provisions (after Feb 2026 for the 2026 notes) (^[5]).

Leverage and Net Cash: Fortinet’s balance sheet is very strong. At the end of Q2 2025, the company held roughly $4.7 billion in combined cash, cash equivalents, and investments, against $1.0 billion in total debt (^[5]) (^[5]). This means Fortinet is in a net cash position (cash exceeds debt by over $3.5B), providing significant financial flexibility. The low debt load and large cash war chest limit the company’s financial risk and give it options to invest in R&D, make acquisitions, or retire debt as needed. Fortinet’s debt-to-equity and debt-to-EBITDA ratios are very conservative for its industry, reflecting effective past profitability and cash generation.

Golden Portfolio

Golden Anomaly: Turn $10k → $1M? Meet the Top Four Picks

Four tiny gold developers. One historic revaluation. A playful chance to change your financial future with just a small stake.

High-grade deposits (yes, really)
“Sweet spot” developers already making free cash flow
Discounts of up to 96% vs fair value

Get the Top Four & Bonus Pick
Instant access — readable on any phone

Interest Coverage: Given the low interest rates on the notes, Fortinet’s interest expense is minimal. In the first half of 2025, total interest expense was $9.0 million (^[5]) – roughly $18 million annualized – while the company earned $873.5 million in net income over the same six-month period (^[4]). This implies an interest coverage ratio (EBIT/interest) well above 50×, indicating Fortinet can easily meet its interest obligations. Even on a cash flow basis, operating cash flow in H1 2025 (~$1.1 billion) dwarfed interest costs. In short, debt servicing is not a strain on Fortinet’s finances. The upcoming $500M maturity in March 2026 is easily manageable – Fortinet could repay it from cash on hand (which exceeds $3.3B (^[5])) or refinance at likely still favorable terms.

Valuation and Financial Performance

Earnings & Growth: Fortinet has been a growth winner in cybersecurity, though its growth is now moderating. In Q2 2025, revenue grew 14% year-over-year to $1.63 billion (^[6]), continuing a trend of double-digit expansion but slower than the 20%+ rates of previous years. For full-year 2025, management’s guidance projects revenue of ~$6.75 billion (up ~17% YoY at midpoint) and non-GAAP net earnings of about $2.50 per share (^[6]). Notably, Fortinet beat Q2 earnings estimates and even raised its full-year billings outlook by $100 million (^[4]). However, underlying metrics raised eyebrows – product revenue growth was flat-to-negative when excluding the temporary boost from customers upgrading older firewall units (the refresh cycle). Free cash flow also dipped year-on-year as mentioned, reflecting some softness in cash conversion (^[4]).

Current Valuation: After the recent sell-off, Fortinet shares trade around the low-$80s, equating to a market capitalization near $64 billion (^[7]). At this price, FTNT is valued at roughly 33× trailing earnings (^[8]) (and a similar ~33× the midpoint of 2025’s expected ~$2.50 EPS). This earnings multiple is a premium to the broader market and to some slower-growth security peers. For instance, Check Point Software trades at about 25–27× earnings (^[9]), reflecting its lower growth, while faster-growing peer Palo Alto Networks commands an even higher forward multiple (50×+ non-GAAP earnings) despite heavy stock-based compensation (^[10]). On a revenue basis, Fortinet’s enterprise value is about 8–9× 2025 sales, which is elevated but not atypical for a profitable cybersecurity leader. The valuation implies investors still expect healthy growth and market share gains from Fortinet. Whether FTNT is a bargain after the dip or still expensive depends on its future growth trajectory – if the company can reaccelerate beyond the current mid-teens revenue growth, the multiple could be justified, but if growth sputters further, the stock may have more room to fall.

Skimmer Meter

When the meter spikes, Larry's followers act — and profits often explode.

Get Alerts

Peer Comparisons: Fortinet’s profitability is strong (non-GAAP operating margins ~32–33% (^[6])) and the company generates substantial cash, supporting its premium valuation. Unlike some peers, Fortinet is solidly GAAP-profitable and has a balance of product and services revenue. However, investors are now questioning its growth drivers. The next section digs into those concerns and other risks.

Risks, Red Flags, and Open Questions

Several risk factors and red flags have emerged in the wake of Fortinet’s recent earnings and the class action announcement:

– Firewall Refresh Slowdown: The biggest immediate concern is the near-completion of Fortinet’s firewall product refresh cycle. Management had touted a multi-year upgrade cycle as a growth catalyst, but by Q2 2025 they admitted the cycle was already “40–50%” done (^[2]). Analysts described the Q2 update as “cold water on the refresh cycle,” noting that underlying product revenue was flat-to-down year-over-year in the first half of 2025 excluding the refresh boost (^[11]). This suggests that demand for Fortinet’s core firewall appliances (a “small percentage” of overall business in unit terms (^[2])) may be saturating. Open question: Can Fortinet find new drivers of hardware growth, or will product sales stagnate once the remaining 50–60% of upgrades are done?

– Class Action Allegations: The securities class action lawsuit (filed in Northern California) is a red flag regarding management’s credibility. The complaint – led by a state pension fund – alleges that Fortinet misled investors between Nov 2024 and Aug 2025 by overstating the refresh cycle’s potential and obscuring how quickly upgrades were pulled forward (^[2]). Specifically, it claims Fortinet “knew the refresh would never be as lucrative as represented” and had already pushed through roughly half of the upgrades by Q2 2025 while telling investors the cycle would “gain momentum over two years” (^[12]). It also alleges Fortinet lacked a clear picture of how many units actually needed upgrading (^[12]). If these claims are proven, Fortinet could face financial penalties and reputational damage. At minimum, the suit has galvanized investor scrutiny. (It’s worth noting the CEO sold a block of shares (~0.3% of his stake) in early August at ~$98, just days before the stock plunged (^[13]) – though this was via a pre-arranged plan, the optics are not great.) Open question: How will this litigation play out, and might Fortinet alter its disclosure practices or guidance conservatism as a result?

– Slowing Growth & Guidance Risk: Beyond the refresh issue, Fortinet’s overall growth outlook has become murkier. The company’s Q3 2025 revenue guidance (≈$1.70B) came in weaker than analysts expected, triggering the steep selloff (^[1]). Several Wall Street analysts downgraded FTNT after earnings, citing a “meaningful change” in the company’s growth thesis (^[11]). Morgan Stanley, for example, cut the stock to Equal-weight, explaining that the anticipated ~$400M firewall refresh revenue boost through 2026 is no longer realistic with half the cycle already done (^[11]). KeyBanc and Piper Sandler issued similar downgrades, calling Fortinet a “show-me situation” where investors will need to see evidence of reaccelerating growth before confidence returns (^[11]). Open question: Can Fortinet meet or beat its tempered guidance in coming quarters, or could further disappointments lie ahead if IT spending or competitive pressures intensify?

– Competitive Pressure: Fortinet operates in an intensely competitive cybersecurity market. It faces rivals ranging from Palo Alto Networks and Cisco in network security, to cloud-native security firms like Zscaler and CrowdStrike in adjacent areas. Fortinet’s risk disclosures acknowledge that the company may not be able to maintain or improve its competitive position against both established and emerging competitors (^[5]). If key customers choose competitors’ platforms (for instance, if cloud-based security solutions cannibalize firewall appliance demand), Fortinet’s growth and pricing power could suffer. The firm has been investing in integrating networking and security (Secure Networking, SASE, etc.) to stay ahead, but competition remains a persistent risk.

– Macro & Enterprise Spending: Like other tech companies, Fortinet is exposed to macroeconomic factors. Tightening IT budgets or delayed enterprise projects can hit cybersecurity spending. Management has cautioned that an economic downturn or reduced IT spending (especially on firewall hardware) could adversely impact results (^[5]). In 2022–2023, supply chain issues and chip shortages also constrained Fortinet’s hardware business (leading to order backlogs), though those issues have eased. Now the concern is more on the demand side: if high inflation, interest rates, or geopolitical uncertainty cause businesses to curtail capital expenditures, big firewall upgrades might be deferred, hurting Fortinet’s near-term product sales. Recent earnings calls noted some large deals taking longer to close amid macro uncertainty (^[14]) (^[14]). The stability of subscription-based revenue (services and security updates) provides a buffer, but roughly 1/3 of Fortinet’s revenue is from product sales that are more cyclical.

– Leadership Transitions: Fortinet saw veteran CFO Keith Jensen retire in mid-2025 after 11 years with the company (^[15]). While this was a planned retirement with a successor in place, any C-suite changes can introduce execution risk. Further, Fortinet’s long-time sales chief (Chief Revenue Officer) is set to retire in 2024 (^[16]). Investors will be watching how the new CFO and sales leaders navigate the current challenges. The tone from the top matters, especially as the class action puts a spotlight on past communication. So far, CEO Ken Xie (also founder) continues to lead the company, and his strategic vision and large ownership stake (he and his brother are significant shareholders) have been a stabilizing factor.

Conclusion & Outlook

Bottom Line: Fortinet remains one of the largest and most profitable cybersecurity firms globally, but it is at a crossroads. The recent firewall refresh missteps and ensuing stock drop have raised questions about the sustainability of its growth and the transparency of its management’s communications. On the positive side, Fortinet has a strong financial foundation – zero net debt, robust cash flows, and continued innovation in areas like Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) and security operations services. In fact, the company reported Annual Recurring Revenue growth of +22% in SASE and +35% in security operations for Q2 (^[4]), highlighting new growth vectors beyond traditional firewalls. These emerging segments could help offset the firewall slowdown, and Fortinet’s extensive customer base and integrated platform are competitive advantages.

However, investors may be in “wait-and-see” mode as the company works through this transition. Fortinet now has to “show me” that it can reaccelerate growth without the tailwind of a big hardware upgrade cycle (^[11]). The stock’s valuation (30+ P/E range) leaves little room for error – any further growth disappointments or negative developments from the class action could pressure the shares. Conversely, if Fortinet can execute on upselling subscriptions, capitalize on demand for network-security convergence, and prove the recent stumble was an outlier, today’s prices might look attractive in hindsight.

Open Questions for Investors: Is the class action noise creating a buying opportunity in a high-quality business, or does it portend deeper issues with management credibility? Are you missing out on potential class action recovery if you held FTNT during the affected period, or missing out on a chance to invest in Fortinet’s long-term story at a discount? These questions underscore the current divide in market sentiment. As of now, caution is warranted – Fortinet’s fundamentals are solid, but it must navigate the next few quarters carefully. Investors should watch for updates on the class action process, any changes to guidance or booking trends, and signs of momentum in the newer product areas. Until clarity improves, Fortinet will likely trade as a “show me” story, with the onus on management to demonstrate that the company can continue delivering growth without catching investors off-guard again.

Sources

For informational purposes only; not investment advice.