NSA’s GPS Spoofing Probe Could Unlock Hidden Gains!

Company Overview

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) is a Maryland-based real estate investment trust focused on self-storage properties in major U.S. metropolitan areas ([1]). As of mid-2025, NSA operated over 1,067 self-storage facilities across 37 states and Puerto Rico, encompassing roughly 69.7 million rentable square feet ([1]). This scale makes NSA one of the largest owners/operators in the self-storage sector. The company has expanded rapidly since its 2015 initial public offering, primarily by acquiring facilities through partnerships with regional operators. Historically, NSA’s unique model involved Participating Regional Operators (PROs) – local storage operators who contributed properties and co-invested via special partnership units. In mid-2024, NSA moved to internalize its PRO structure, bringing management of the remaining ~32% of its properties in-house ([2]). Management expects this internalization to simplify NSA’s structure and improve efficiency, leveraging the company’s now-scaled operating platform ([2]). Overall, NSA’s business model centers on consolidating fragmented self-storage assets under a national platform, aiming to generate steady rental income and growth through economies of scale.

Dividend Policy & Cash Flow Coverage

NSA has a consistent track record of dividend growth, reflecting its REIT mandate to return income to shareholders. The quarterly dividend was raised to $0.57 per share in late 2024, a ~5% increase ([3]). This puts the annualized dividend at about $2.25–$2.28 per share, more than double the payout from five years prior ([4]) ([4]). At the recent share price (~$30), the stock’s dividend yield is approximately 7% ([5]). Such a high yield indicates the market’s cautious view, but also highlights NSA’s income appeal. In fact, NSA has boosted its dividend every year since IPO, growing total annual distributions from ~$1.04/share in 2017 to $2.25 in 2024 ([4]) ([4]). However, the pace of raises has slowed – the total 2024 dividend was only marginally above 2023’s $2.23/share payout ([4]), reflecting stalling FFO growth.

Crucially, NSA’s dividend coverage by cash flow is getting tight. In full-year 2024, the trust generated about $2.44 in Core FFO per share, only ~8% above the $2.25 paid out in dividends ([6]) ([6]). This implies a high ~92% payout ratio of FFO, leaving a thin buffer for reinvestment or further dividend hikes. Through Q3 2025, Core FFO per share actually declined ~9% year-on-year due to lower occupancy and higher interest expenses ([6]) ([6]). In Q3 2025, Core FFO was $0.57/share, essentially equal to the quarterly dividend ([6]). NSA has maintained its dividend so far, but coverage is shrinking – a trend to monitor. The use of Adjusted FFO (AFFO), which accounts for recurring capital expenditures, is also relevant. While NSA doesn’t explicitly report AFFO in press releases, its maintenance capex is relatively low (self-storage has modest upkeep needs), so Core FFO is a good proxy for cash available for distribution. The bottom line is that NSA’s dividend is fully funded by operating cash flow ([6]), but with minimal cushion. Investors enjoy a generous yield, but future dividend growth will likely depend on reaccelerating FFO growth or lowering payout ratios.

Leverage, Debt Maturities & Coverage

NSA employs significant leverage to finance its portfolio, and its debt load is sizeable relative to the company’s market value. As of year-end 2024, NSA carried about $3.45 billion in total debt ([7]) against approximately $5.1 billion in total assets ([6]) ([6]). This equates to a debt-to-capitalization in the ~60–65% range, which is higher than larger self-storage REIT peers. NSA’s debt primarily consists of a $950 million revolving credit facility and numerous unsecured term loans and notes laddered out over the next decade ([7]) ([7]). Near-term maturities are manageable but noteworthy. The revolver matures in January 2027 (with optional extensions to 2028) ([7]), and two term loans – $275 million due July 2026 and $130 million due March 2027 – will require refinancing or repayment in the next 1–2 years ([7]) ([7]). Additionally, NSA has a series of small unsecured note maturities in 2026 (total ~$100 million) and larger notes coming due from 2028 onward ([7]) ([7]). The maturity schedule is well-laddered, with no single year (outside 2026–27) representing an outsized portion of debt. For instance, NSA issued numerous senior unsecured notes maturing from 2028 through 2033, generally in $50–$175 million tranches ([7]) ([7]). This staggering of maturities should help NSA avoid a liquidity crunch, though it will face a refinancing grind over the coming years (rolling over some debt annually).

Secret Supply Chain Map — Made in America
Discover where TSMC, Intel & Samsung are putting fabs — and which tiny suppliers sit in their shadows.
Heads up: October 16th is the date that could change everything.

NSA’s interest rate exposure is mixed. Many of the term loans are swapped to fixed rates in the 4%–5% range ([7]) ([7]), and past unsecured notes were issued at rates from ~3% to 6% depending on the year ([7]) ([7]). However, with prevailing rates higher, any new financing is likely to come at the upper end of that range or beyond. NSA’s interest expense has already been climbing, reflecting debt refinancing and variable-rate borrowings. In the first nine months of 2025, interest expense was $122.3 million, up ~6% from $114.9 million in the same period of 2024 ([6]) ([6]). Higher interest costs directly weighed on earnings – management noted that rising interest expense was a primary driver of FFO per share decline in 2025 ([6]). Despite this, NSA’s fixed-charge coverage remains adequate for now. Using EBITDA as a proxy for cash earnings, NSA generated ~$362 million EBITDA in the first three quarters of 2025 ([6]), about 3.0× its interest expense over that period ([6]). On a full-year basis, EBITDA-to-interest coverage is estimated around 3–3.5×, which is acceptable but below many larger REIT peers that often sport 5× or better coverage. Net debt to EBITDA stands roughly in the high-6× to 7× range, underscoring a leveraged balance sheet. While this leverage amplifies NSA’s returns in good times (and was used to fund its aggressive acquisition strategy), it also heightens risk if property cash flows decline or if credit markets tighten. Going forward, deleveraging might be prudent – NSA could look to slow acquisitions, retain more cash (via a lower payout ratio or asset sales), or even issue equity if its stock recovers, to keep leverage in check. The company does have preferred equity (~$340 million outstanding) ([6]), which provides some capital cushion, but those also come with fixed dividend obligations. Overall, NSA’s debt is manageable but high, and diligent refinancing and interest rate risk management will be key focus areas.

Valuation & Peer Comparison

NSA’s shares currently trade at a valuation that is discounted relative to larger peers in the self-storage REIT space. In terms of Price-to-FFO (P/FFO) – a key metric for REIT valuations – NSA is around 12×–13× trailing FFO, based on ~$2.40–$2.44 FFO per share for 2024 ([6]) ([8]) and a stock price in the low $30s. A recent analysis pegged NSA’s P/FFO at about 13.1×, notably cheaper than industry leader Public Storage (PSA) at ~19× and also below mid-sized peer CubeSmart (CUBE) at ~16× ([8]) ([8]). This relative discount suggests investors assign NSA a risk premium – likely due to its smaller size, higher leverage, and recent earnings softness – but also implies upside potential if these issues are resolved. By comparison, the self-storage REIT sector’s typical P/FFO range has been ~14×–18× in recent years ([8]). NSA’s valuation multiples (P/FFO ~13×, EV/EBITDA ~17×) sit at the low end of the range, even as the company’s portfolio quality and scale are comparable to peers in many respects. The dividend yield of ~7% is also far above peers like PSA (~4%) or EXR (~5%), indicating the market’s cautious stance on NSA or possibly an underpricing.

From another angle, if NSA’s stock were to trade at a more peer-level FFO multiple (say 15×), it would imply a share price in the mid-$30s (roughly 15 × $2.20–$2.40 FFO, factoring in the recent dip in earnings). Third-party analysts indeed estimate fair value in the $32–$36 range if NSA were valued closer to a 14× P/FFO multiple ([8]). This suggests hidden upside could be unlocked if NSA demonstrates renewed FFO growth or risk factors abate. It’s worth noting that self-storage real estate had a boom during 2020–2021 (high occupancy, raising rents), and valuations soared; since then, multiples have compressed amid normalization of demand and higher interest rates. NSA’s stock, in particular, has pulled back significantly from pandemic-era highs (it traded over $60 at one point in 2021–2022). The current valuation appears to price in a lot of bad news already – including flat earnings growth and elevated debt concerns. Should NSA stabilize its fundamentals and resume growth (or refinance debt without issue), there is room for multiple expansion. On the other hand, a persisting slump in storage demand or any dividend cut could keep the stock’s multiple depressed. Investors thus are essentially paid to wait via the 7% yield, while hoping for a rerating.

3 quick reasons to grab this report now
Start collecting royalty checks before the first national payout.

Step 1

Learn the exact royalty play paying monthly checks

Step 2

Start with as little as $50 — get paid next month

Step 3

Position yourself before Wall Street moves in

Grab My Copy

In comparison to direct peers: – Public Storage (PSA) – the largest in the sector – enjoys a premium valuation for its fortress balance sheet and scale, but NSA’s smaller size and lower credit rating warrant some discount. – Extra Space Storage (EXR) and CubeSmart (CUBE) are mid/large-cap peers; NSA trades below both on P/FFO basis, even though all are facing similar industry headwinds. – NSA’s discount may also reflect its complex structure (with past PRO incentives and noncontrolling JV interests) and slightly less proven track record. However, any convergence toward peer metrics could mean outperformance for NSA shares.

Risks & Red Flags

Despite its attractive yield and growth history, NSA faces several risks and potential red flags that investors should monitor:

High Payout & Slowing Dividend Growth: NSA’s payout ratio is very elevated – over 90% of core FFO in 2024 ([6]). This leaves little margin for error. With FFO under pressure in 2025, the dividend is barely covered by cash flow ([6]). NSA has been reluctant to pause its dividend growth (given a 8+ year streak of increases), but if fundamentals deteriorate further, a dividend freeze (or cut in a worst-case) could become a risk. At the very least, investors should not expect the rapid double-digit dividend hikes of prior years to resume until earnings growth returns. The recent token increase (only +$0.01 quarterly in late 2024) signals that management is being cautious ([3]).

Gray Swan

Limited-Time: Join the Fraternity

Get full access to reports, weekly briefings, and the Dollar 2.0 playbook.
$79
3 months access — risk-free trial

Leverage and Refinancing Risk: NSA’s debt load is high, and upcoming maturities will need refinancing in a higher-rate environment. While the debt ladder is staggered, the mid-2026 term loan maturity ($275 M) ([7]) and the heavy reliance on the revolving credit line (over $440 M drawn ([7])) pose refinancing risks. If credit markets tighten or lenders require higher spreads, NSA might face higher interest costs or restrictive covenants. Its current interest coverage (~3× EBITDA) is adequate but not strong, so any further jump in interest expense could squeeze coverage ratios. A related red flag is NSA’s credit rating – it is not in the A-rated league of Public Storage; if perceived as a weaker credit, borrowing costs can rise further. High leverage also constrains NSA’s capacity to invest in new properties without external capital. In short, financial flexibility is limited until NSA can deleverage or its earnings grow.

Softening Fundamentals in Self-Storage: The self-storage industry enjoyed record occupancy and rent growth during 2020–2021, but supply and demand have since rebalanced. NSA has reported declining same-store performance in recent quarters – e.g., same-store net operating income fell ~5.7% year-over-year in Q3 2025, driven by a 2.6% drop in revenues and higher operating costs ([6]). Occupancy has slid to 84.5% as of Q3 2025, down ~140 basis points from a year prior ([6]). This indicates near-term demand weakness or possible oversupply in some markets. There’s a risk that new storage facility construction (which ramped up when the sector was hot) could outpace demand, pressuring rents. NSA’s CEO noted that while trends may be bottoming, the operating environment remains competitive ([6]) – suggesting promotional discounts and elevated marketing spend might be needed to maintain occupancy. If rental rates stagnate or decline, NSA’s FFO growth could be muted, given its largely fixed cost of debt and operating leverage. Investors should watch for any further erosion in same-store metrics as a warning sign.

External Growth Slowdown: NSA’s historical growth has been fueled by acquisitions – often by teaming up with regional operators (the PRO model). Lately, however, external growth has slowed considerably. In 2023–2024, NSA completed only modest acquisitions (e.g. just 2 properties for ~$32 million in Q3 2025 via a joint venture) ([6]), a far cry from prior years’ activity. This slowdown is partly by choice (to avoid dilutive deals when cost of capital is high) and partly market-driven (sellers’ price expectations vs. higher cap rates). If the acquisition pipeline remains subdued, NSA’s growth will rely purely on organic performance, which, as noted, has been soft. An associated risk is that NSA’s smaller size and higher cost of capital make it harder to compete with giants like PSA or EXR for acquisitions in prime markets. Losing out on growth opportunities could cement NSA’s valuation discount. On the flip side, undisciplined acquisitions just for growth could be value-destructive – so NSA faces a delicate balance.

Complex Structure & Noncontrolling Interests: NSA’s corporate structure has historically been more complex than peers’. The company operates via an operating partnership and had various subordinated performance units held by PROs, leading to significant noncontrolling interests on its balance sheet. As of September 2025, over $600 million of equity was attributable to noncontrolling interests ([6]) – essentially the portion of joint ventures and OP units owned by others. While the ongoing internalization should simplify this, there may be one-time integration costs or cultural challenges as local partners cede control to the REIT. Investors should verify that the promised “accretive” benefits of internalization ([2]) (like reduced management fee payments to PROs, which NSA has highlighted) actually materialize in higher earnings. Any hiccups in integrating operations, or lingering conflicts with former PRO owners (now large shareholders), could be governance red flags. Furthermore, NSA must now fully absorb the G&A costs that PROs used to handle in the field, which could temporarily elevate expenses (though offset by eliminating fee payments). Overall, while not an outright “red flag,” NSA’s evolving structure bears watching – simplicity and transparency are improving, but not yet at the level of a traditional single-tier REIT.

Macroeconomic & Other Risks: As with all REITs, interest rate volatility is a key risk – higher rates can both increase NSA’s interest expense and make its dividend less attractive relative to bonds. Economic downturns could reduce consumer demand for storage (people tend to rent storage units more during life transitions like moving, which slow in recessions). Storage also faces minimal but present environmental risk (e.g. properties in hurricane-prone regions, though typically insured) and property tax increases which can pressure NOI. Lastly, any deterioration in tenant credit or a spike in delinquencies (if consumers prioritize other expenses over storage rent) could hurt cash flow, though so far storage defaults remain low due to month-to-month leases and ability to auction off stored goods.

Valuation Upside Catalysts

While the challenges above are real, NSA does have potential upside catalysts that could unlock those “hidden gains” alluded to in our title. First, operational turnaround: if NSA’s assertion that fundamentals have “found a bottom” holds true ([6]), then even modest improvements in occupancy or rent growth into 2026 can drive a meaningful rebound in FFO (since storage operating margins are high). Management expects a more favorable supply/demand balance by 2026 as new construction tapers off and housing activity stabilizes ([6]). Should this scenario play out, investor sentiment toward the self-storage sector – and NSA – could improve, narrowing the valuation gap.

Second, capital market relief: any sign of interest rate cuts (as the Fed’s cycle turns) would directly benefit NSA by reducing future refinancing costs and increasing the present value of long-duration cash flows. A lower-rate environment might also reopen the acquisition engine, as deal cap rates adjust, allowing NSA to grow externally again without diluting returns. In essence, easing financial conditions could simultaneously boost NSA’s earnings and investors’ appetite for REIT stocks, a double win for the share price.

Third, there is the possibility of strategic actions. The self-storage industry has seen consolidation – notably, Extra Space Storage acquired Life Storage in 2023 in a $13 billion deal, creating the largest storage operator ([9]). NSA, with its ~$2.5 billion market cap and quality portfolio, could attract interest as a takeover target if its valuation stays depressed. A larger peer or private equity player might see value in NSA’s assets and platform. While there are no concrete rumors, the precedent is there for M&A in the space. Alternatively, NSA itself could pursue a joint venture or asset sales to recycle capital – for instance, selling a stake in a portfolio of properties to raise cash to pay down debt (NSA already uses JVs opportunistically). Any moves that strengthen the balance sheet (selling lower-yield assets, issuing preferred equity, etc.) could be catalysts by reducing the risk profile and bridging the valuation gap.

Open Questions & Outlook

Looking ahead, several open questions remain that will determine whether NSA can indeed unlock hidden gains for shareholders:

When will FFO growth reaccelerate? After a flat-to-down 2024–2025, NSA is banking on an inflection in 2026 as industry conditions improve ([6]). Investors will be watching same-store revenue trends and occupancy closely in upcoming quarters. A return to even low-single-digit growth would ease many concerns, whereas continued declines might force a strategic rethink (or capital allocation changes).

How will NSA navigate its 2026–2027 debt wall? The company’s ability to refinance or pay down its 2026 term loan and upcoming credit facility maturity is a test of its financial flexibility. Successful refinancing on reasonable terms (or asset sales to deleverage) would reassure investors. Conversely, any difficulty rolling over debt – say needing to refinance at punitive rates, or a credit rating downgrade – could pressure the stock and potentially the dividend. NSA still has unused revolver capacity and could tap unsecured debt markets, but at a higher cost today. This will be a key storyline to follow.

Will dividend policy shift? NSA’s management must decide whether to prioritize financial prudence over dividend growth in the near term. One open question is whether they consider holding the dividend flat for a period to retain cash for debt reduction or acquisitions. Given the high current yield, investors might accept a pause in growth if it shores up long-term value. However, any hint of a dividend cut would be taken negatively; thus far management has been adamant about maintaining the payout. Their stance may evolve if conditions stay challenging.

Is NSA on the menu for consolidation? With industry giants growing via acquisitions (e.g. Life Storage’s buyout ([9])), one can’t ignore the possibility that NSA could be acquired or merge with a peer. Its stock price weakness could make it vulnerable to a bid if a larger REIT or infrastructure fund sees an arbitrage. NSA’s relatively complex structure might have been a deterrent in the past, but post-internalization it could be simpler to integrate. Management’s view on this (stay independent and grow, or consider a sale) is unknown – but any strategic interest from outsiders would certainly be a wildcard “hidden gain” for shareholders.

Can internalization drive efficiencies? After bringing PRO operations in-house, NSA projected cost savings and better alignment ([2]). Investors will be looking for evidence that G&A expenses as a percentage of revenue come down over time, and that NSA can operate those formerly PRO-managed properties without hiccups. If the transition is smooth, NSA could see margin improvement (boosting FFO). If not, it could temporarily weigh on results. This raises the question of how effectively NSA can scale its internal management to over 1,000 properties nationwide.

In conclusion, NSA offers a high-current yield and asset footprint that could translate into substantial upside, but it comes with above-average risk for a REIT of its type. The company’s “GPS spoofing probe” – to play on our title’s metaphor – suggests that deep analysis and perhaps unconventional strategies may be needed to navigate the current challenges. If NSA can “triangulate” a way to bolster FFO growth (through improving markets or financial maneuvers) without losing its footing, the stock’s undervaluation relative to peers could correct in a rewarding way. Investors should stay tuned to upcoming earnings for signs of stabilization, and keep an eye on how management addresses the critical questions of leverage and growth. For now, NSA remains a show-me story: the raw ingredients for hidden gains are there, but clear signals – not spoofs – of fundamental improvement will likely be required to unlock them. ([6]) ([8])

Sources

  1. https://ir.nsastorage.com/company-information
  2. https://ir.nsastorage.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/176/national-storage-affiliates-trust-announces-internalization-of-its-pro-structure
  3. https://streetinsider.com/dividend_history.php?q=NSA
  4. https://ir.nsastorage.com/financial-and-stock-info/tax-treatment-of-dividends
  5. https://reit.com/investing/reit-directory/national-storage-affiliates
  6. https://ir.nsastorage.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/200/national-storage-affiliates-trust-reports-third-quarter-2025-results
  7. https://ir.nsastorage.com/sec-filings/all-sec-filings/content/0001628280-25-008656/nsa-20241231.htm
  8. https://koalagains.com/stocks/NYSE/NSA
  9. https://therealdeal.com/national/2023/04/03/extra-space-storage-acquires-rival-in-13b-deal/

For informational purposes only; not investment advice.